" . . . an HIV-Free Generation"?! Really?
This Sunday, May 18, is the annual AIDS Walk in New York
City. This is a big event: last year, some
30,000 people participated in this 10K "non-race" in Central Park and
nearby neighborhoods and raised roughly $5.5 million toward HIV/AIDS causes
locally and elsewhere.
Coincidentally, a leading health policy research journal Health
Affairs published articles in its March issue on HIV topics. One of them, highlighted on the cover, has
the title "Policy Choices for an HIV-Free Generation."
What a concept, to even imagine an HIV-free generation! Accompanying articles talk about a concept
almost as startling, growing old with an HIV+ condition. How times have changed for these people.
This topic is close to our heart. The first person we knew who died of AIDS
passed away in the spring of 1983, near the very beginning of this tragic
epidemic. We have lost at least a dozen
other friends through the years and even the husband of a cousin. In a sign of the changing fortunes of this
population, however, the last two HIV+ people we knew never developed AIDS
itself and lived into their 70s, approaching the lifespan of the overall
population. We wrote of this at the
passing of one of them in late 2012. At
that time, we were deeply moved that Bob and Michael could have pretty much
normal, active lives while taking their anti-retroviral medications. We are touched anew by the current attention
this health condition is receiving and by the striking results of the now more
than 15-years' worth of anti-retroviral treatments. What dramatic outcomes there are.
First (in order, but not priority), combination
anti-retroviral therapy, known as cART, more than pays for itself
economically. Researchers at the
University of Southern California and at Bristol-Myers Squib analyzed the added
life expectancies against the $12,000+ annual cost of the treatment. They conclude that patients' added lifespan
has an estimated value several times greater than the cost of the therapy. Further, their study indicates that since the
people are healthier while taking the ART and since it has preventive
qualities, it should be started early, before the infection evolves into a more
serious symptomatic condition. The
phrase taking hold is "test and treat", don't wait until people's
infection rating gets worse before starting treatment.
In addition, as we just noted, the cART is
"preventive". It's not a
vaccine, which just has to be administered once. It's a continuing treatment over potentially
many years. But it works. So the next step is to use it as a
prophylactic for partners of infected individuals. Treating them can keep them from getting
infected in the first place. This is
also worthwhile economically, to say nothing of how it is stabilizing to the
daily lives of the individual and the partner couple. Other analysts in the Health Affairs issue
estimate that cART has prevented 13,500 infections per year since it was
introduced broadly in 1996.
All of this is not a signal that the war against this brutal
health condition has been won. Numerous
issues remain. There is still a social
stigma. HIV+ people need employment, but
often face obstacles to getting a job.
Now that many are getting older and trying to lead more normal lives, they
may well face obstacles to forming social relationships: they're both older and
HIV+. Further, as people enjoy the
benefits of cART, they may get less cautious in their sexual practices and even
lax in taking the meds themselves. This
is the situation known to economists as "moral hazard"; people who
know they have added protection may take more risk. Separately, financing their treatment can get
tricky as the Affordable Care Act (ACA) meshes with the long-standing federally
funded Ryan White Program and numerous state versions of Medicaid, many of
which are being restructured. At the
same time, it's estimated that the ACA will facilitate HIV testing for as many
as 500,000 people in just the next three years, surely a big help.
Among other lingering concerns, all the good news we
describe here pertains to the United States.
A look at a few of the organization who share in the proceeds of AIDS
Walk New York gives an idea of the variety of other AIDS-related issues that
remain. Among nearly 40 groups all
together, funds go to Keep a Child Alive, which provides anti-retroviral drugs
to African children; Africa Tikkun provides education and social services to
children and families in South African villages; and AID for AIDS assists
people in Latin America and the Caribbean.
Still, even with the caveats we state, we can see that the
wider testing in the US and the recognition of the benefits of early administration
of cART indeed create the plausibility of a generation free of HIV in the US. We hear so much about the troubles in medical
care delivery these days, and it's nice to stop and recognize a genuine triumph
for potentially millions of people.
* * * * *
Visit the AIDS Walk website: http://www.aidswalk.net/newyork . DONATE!!
The Health Affairs articles are here: http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/33/3.toc
. The issue is aimed at the impact of
the Affordable Care Act on outreach to HIV/AIDS patients and the jail
population. We have not yet examined the
latter material. The HIV/AIDS articles
we found most interesting include "Living with HIV and Growing Old" a
portrait of a particular gentleman, two articles on the costs and benefits of
early cART treatments and the policy summary.
All of it is helpful and accessible to general readers.
Labels: American Society, Health Care and Pensions, People
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home