Ferguson, Staten Island and Moving Forward
25, Barbara Crafton posted the following comment on the Geranium Farm Facebook
Discouraged and sad about yet another young black man who won't grow old, yet
another set of parents who won't see grandchildren, yet another town torn
apart. And another missed chance for all of us.
Or is it missed? We still have a chance to learn a better way. But first we
must admit that we need one. And that means we must listen to one another, and
not leave the room when someone says something that we don't like, muttering
something snide about "playing the race card." Newsflash: we are ALL
playing the race card, all the time, and most of us don't know it. None of us
can opt out of this deadly game.
But we CAN decide how we will play. Truth or a comfortable lie? A desire to
understand or an insistence on remaining ignorant of realities other than the
one we ourselves inhabit.
We have no grounds for despair, and no right to it. Not as long as we're still
intending to add some of our own commentary to this about moving forward from
here. Those thoughts originated as an
extension of the article we posted two weeks ago about lower labor force
participation and how that condition might be corrected. That problem may be different from the racism
questions Barbara discusses, but the two may have similar answers.
to our surprise, a grand jury in Staten Island, New York, declared that it
would not indict another white policeman for his fierce action against still
another black man he was trying to arrest.
This one is closer to home, quite literally.
We live at
the Brooklyn end of the Brooklyn Bridge.
On that afternoon of December 3rd
, we had occasion to cross
the street right at the entrance to the Bridge, at about 5:15PM, roughly two-and-a-half
hours after the grand jury's decision became known. There were police everywhere. A block or so on up a hill toward Brooklyn
Heights, a group of police vans and cars was parked next to a park. The cops, fortunately, were standing around
idly because right then they had nothing to do.
I chatted with one of them in a nearby diner, and he told me that, in
contrast, his colleagues elsewhere in the city were plenty busy. Indeed, that was the time when the
"die-in" at Grand Central Station was going on. The next day, after a night of demonstrations
around the city, heavy, visible police presence remained in our local
neighborhood and, I assume, elsewhere around the city.
Ferguson, these New York City protests seem non-violent; hardly any property
has been damaged and we've not heard of any significant injuries.
We do hope
the judge in the Staten Island court will accede to the prosecutor's request
and release some of the grand jury records.
Through various press reports and conversations, we have come to
understand, though, that Eric Garner was actively resisting arrest, which makes
the policeman's actions look less overdone than the video of the incident alone
might indicate. Also, we learned that
the senior police officer in Daniel Pantaleo's patrol unit that day was a sergeant
who is an African American woman. At the
same time, our point here is not to make judgments either way on this whole
Our point is
to talk about the kinds of actions that might address some of the underlying
problems. Why are those black men so
desperate that they robbed a convenience store or sold unlicensed
cigarettes. Why are their communities
less well off than surrounding towns or neighborhoods. We've found two specific approaches; they're
long-term actions, not immediate responses, and they're meant to lift up people
in lower-income neighborhoods, regardless of race. These themes seem to fit Barbara Crafton's broader
perspective described in her Ferguson comments.
just become acquainted with a group in Atlanta called Operation HOPE. Perhaps some of you already know them. The founder is John Hope Bryant, an associate
of Andrew Young; one of the board members is Bernice King, daughter of Martin Luther
King, Jr. Operation HOPE works in
schools in low-income areas to help students learn about legitimate banking and
business activities. In a recent book on
his work, Bryant explains that the people who live there have
entrepreneurial talents and leanings; it's just that their businesses
concentrate on illegitimate activities like drugs – or in Mr. Garner's case,
selling unlicensed cigarettes on a street corner. So Bryant wants to shift them to more
fulfilling work; he talks about a young man who took a notary public exam and
then set up a portable notary business.
He talks about three young men who set up a cleaning and yard-work
business in his own community. Then
Operation HOPE works with banks to set up regularized financial services in
these neighborhoods; bank managers go into schools and explain standard banking
to students, so they know there is an alternative to check-cashing outlets and
loan sharks. SunTrust Banks in Atlanta
is one of the main supporters and participants in these efforts, as are other
just become acquainted with Nicole Baker Fulgham. Dr. Fulgham is founder of The Expectations
Project, an organization that seeks to further education reform and narrow the
academic achievement gap by enlisting particular contributions from churches
and people of faith. She will appear in
January at Trinity Institute at Trinity Church Wall Street in New York. She has written Educating All God's Children
describing the need for this work .
We are still reading the book, and the early pages document ways poverty
handicaps educational efforts. Intriguingly,
Dr. Fulgham comments on the transformation of the population of the southern
California city where she lived from mainly African American to Hispanic; as that
shift took place, she explains, the African-American leaders in the school
system were hesitant to yield their governance positions and influence to the
incoming Hispanic population even as it became the majority in the
community. Thus, as Barbara Crafton
commented, we can all be racists in one form or another, even if we believe we
want to be anti-racist.
least we can see some ways forward here, which address at least two issues at
once. We can perhaps ease inequality by
lifting up the bottom groups and helping them learn to generate their own
growth. We can limit crime by showing
people fruitful, legal ways to make money.
And we can encourage participation in the real labor force, not the
shadow economy. The drawback, of course,
is getting versions of Mr. Bryant's and Dr. Fulgham's programs in place in the
vast number of locations where they are needed.
That takes time, but maybe if we can all look forward to something
constructive, then fewer people will feel the need to stage a die-in in Grand
Central Station or – this evening – in the intersection in front of Brooklyn's
Barclay Center sports arena.
Hope Bryant, How the Poor Can Save Capitalism
. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers,
Inc. 2014. Operation HOPE's website is www.operationhope.org
Labels: American Society, Christianity
Why People Might Pull Back from the Job Market
early summer we expressed concern that fewer people are participating in the labor market –
fewer people are working or actively hunting for work, relative to the size of
the population – than has been the case for more than 35 years. Five years after the presumed end of a
massive recession, this fact surprised us and we promised to look more into
what might be going on. Shouldn't more people
be more anxious to work or to find work?
Instead, the so-called labor force participation rate stands at just 62.8%
of the population as of October, down from 65.7% in July 2009, the last month of the official
To recap our
June comments a bit, we look at three different age groups, older people, teens
and middle-agers, each of whom has a distinct relationship to the labor market
that reduces its participation. First
and perhaps most straightforward, there are more and more older people, so
retirement is a bigger factor than it has been historically. Indeed, Federal Reserve economists have used
fairly simple arithmetic with Labor Department data to estimate that about
1.25% of the decline in the participation rate is due to the aging
population. We could explore retirement
more, of course, but for our current discussion, this much about that group
will cover it. Second, teen-agers seem
to be less interested in getting a job than they were "when we were their
age". Our subsequent research has
turned up three reasons for this, which we will discuss momentarily. Finally, an increased share of middle-age
workers has been pulling back from the workforce. Since this group is obviously the most
important part of the working population, we want to know more.
Teens: School and Competition from Immigrants
and young adults, increased schooling looks to be the main force. Aaronson and her Federal Reserve colleagues,
whose study we just referenced about retirees, discuss teens as well, examining
the monthly employment data and the Labor Department's "American Time Use
Survey". They show that more young people are enrolled in school and for
those enrolled, school and extracurricular activities take more time every
day. You parents would be aware of this,
and the numbers show it to be so. They
estimate that school enrollment – including increased attendance in summer
school – and school time factors account for about three-quarters of the
decline in teen-age participation in recent years.
two likely and similar reasons for the remaining fall-off in teen-age work
interest. First, teens face heightened competition
from adults without college educations.
Due to changing technology, those adults face an increasingly
complicated job market. It turns out
that the kinds of work young people often do, such as food preparation, retail
sales and personal care, are now done by older workers more frequently than
before. We'll detail this issue when we
talk below about middle-agers. Second,
teens also face increasing competition from immigrant workers. Extensive statistical analysis shows that
teens have been more susceptible than adults to competition from the growing
numbers of immigrants who have no more than a high school education. These immigrants would have about the same amount
of work experience in the U.S. as do native-born teenagers.
altogether, teens are spending more time in school, and they are meeting
greater competition for the kinds of jobs they often do; these factors are
discouraging more of them from even trying to find jobs.
Middle-Agers: Job Polarization a Growing
that concerns us most are the middle-agers, whom labor market analysts refer to
as "prime-working-age" from 25 to 54. While 81%
of this huge group do work or actively seek work, that share has come down from
83% just before the recession. Our
research "googling" has turned up papers from other business
economists, Federal Reserve economists and even the Fed's Chair, which all
indicate that we are hardly the only people puzzled over this pull-back from
work. Even if 2 percentage points
doesn't look very dramatic, the growth of the economy as a whole and especially
the well-being of those very people who have pulled away can be hurt. What's been going on with those middle-agers? Can we tell something about why?
Francisco Federal Reserve economists Mary Daly and Elliot Marks argue that the
depth and severity of the recession have discouraged people but now that total
employment is finally back to pre-recession numbers and looking more vigorous,
those people might be expected to re-enter the labor force and seek jobs anew. Indeed, the September and October employment
reports did look more favorable, extending a trend of quite decent job growth through
seven months and including upward revisions to the last three months' results. Daly and Marks seem to argue that this will
re-attract some "non-participants".
They further argue that, as such a trend might feed on itself, work will
become far more enticing than it has been over the last six or seven years. Separately, the latest several weeks' data on
new claims for unemployment insurance show that layoffs are holding at
eight-year lows, another favorable sign.
writers are not so sanguine. A whole group
of studies has emerged describing a spreading phenomenon known as "job
polarization". This development
could well discourage a sizable group of people from even trying to find
work. You might be able to guess what it
means just from what you already see every day in the working world. At one end are high-level jobs in technology
and finance and business management. At
the other end are service jobs, such as those in restaurants and
hospitals. The middle range of factory
workers and office administrative positions is shrinking. Robots and other sophisticated machines do
increasing amounts of manufacturing assembly work, while the very computers you
and I use every day replace more and more secretaries, bookkeepers and the
like. So the mix of jobs – and incomes –
are more and more polarized: high-end jobs and low-end jobs predominate. This force plays into the income inequality
situation, as it seems to mean that energetic people who may not have advanced
educations might not be able to move up in the world as they have been in
recent decades. A whole "special
report" in a recent issue of The Economist
puts this in fairly stark
terms and discusses its global reach, as it is hardly confined just to the US
concrete proof that polarization is directly connected to people's withdrawal
from the labor force, but we can make one strong inference. The monthly employment survey asks people who
are "not in the labor force" if they would actually like to have a
job or if they don't want to work. For
the middle-aged population, the share who say they don't even want a job has
risen from 14% of that population in the late 1990s to 17% more recently. The share of that age group who would work if
they thought there was a good chance of getting a job has also risen, albeit marginally. Since this age group is much less subject to
retirement than older workers and is seen to face less impact than teens from
the influx of foreign workers, we can only believe that discouragement over the
increasing lack of opportunity is a major factor holding them back.
What Can We Do? Post-High School Training
So what can
be done about "job polarization" and about lower teen participation
in the workforce? Are we stuck in a new
economic quagmire? A full-blown answer
would take much more space than we have here, but we can offer a couple of
Department makes 10-year projections of the growth in various occupations and
categorizes them by the amount of education needed for entry. The middle-range ones being hit by
polarization are typically filled by people with a high-school diploma. Sure enough, projections for those show
several office functions and various kinds of factory assembly work with
absolute declines over coming years.
Even with other jobs expanding, such as personal care assistants,
computer-controlled machine operators and customer service representatives,
total jobs for high school grads are seen as the slowest growing segment.
if people get just a bit more education, such as a vocational school or
community college, their prospects pick up sharply. That is, if they get training in some
technical skill or perhaps additional math background, more occupations with
greater prospective growth will be open to them and will enable them to move
ahead rather than languish. And, in
addition, make more money over their working lives.
we've seen in discussions of these issues is "employability". Specific job qualifications are obviously
important. But recently, prospective
employers report that they often meet candidates who don't have so-called
"soft skills". While the
amount of education someone has may address the impact of job polarization, it
can be the soft-skill, employability issue that covers everyone and all jobs,
technical, advanced professional or low-end, this last sort the kind that
teenagers and immigrant laborers often compete for. Soft skills: do you dress properly, are you
on time, do you listen carefully to instructions and in turn do you ask
relevant questions to clarify and enhance your understanding, and perhaps most
seriously, can you pass a drug test.
Indeed, in a recent listing of the 10 most important skills employers
are known to desire in order to hire for some presumed popular jobs, the first
four are the soft ones. Would you be
a responsible and attentive worker, whatever the job itself is about. These skills can be taught at home, in high
school and also in many workforce development programs run by local governments
and nonprofit organizations.
focused for the workaday world is one big answer to our potential job and labor
market predicament. There are also social
factors, such as single-parent households, that contribute to trends in labor
force participation. And we haven't
mentioned lackluster wage gains. So
there is farther to go on these issues.
For the present, we do have the one approach of training, which can
help, and help a lot.
Christopher L. Smith. "The Impact
of Low-Skilled Immigration on the Youth Labor Market," Journal of Labor Economics. Vol. 30, No. 1, January 2012. Pp 55-89.
 Mary C.
Daly and Elliot M. Marks. "The
Labor Market in the Aftermath of the Great Recession," Business
Economics. Vol. 49, No. 3, July
2014. Pp. 149-155.
Bureau of Labor Statistics.
"Employment Projections: Occupational employment, job
openings and worker characteristics." December 2013. http://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_table_107.htm. The table includes more than 800 occupational
categories, which we sorted by educational requirements.
Lockhart. "Strategic Workforce
Development: Training for Employability."
Keynote Remarks for Community Development Conference: Transforming U.S.
Workforce Development Policies for the 21st Century. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New
Jersey, October 16, 2014.
President and Chief Executive of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, a
co-sponsor of the conference. He
mentions three soft-skills training programs, Year-Up, STRIVE, and 12 for Life.
Personal Finances, the Great Recession and the Sluggish Recovery
We all keep wishing the economy would "feel
better", don't we? that there could be a sense of greater confidence in
jobs, in opportunities, in everyone's financial situations. We wonder why the recovery from the recent
Great Recession could be taking so very long.
Our last look at the economy, posted in late June, focused
on the job market, and we promised then to talk again about possible reasons
the current malaise has resulted in people dropping out of the labor
force. Very soon, the Census Bureau and
the Labor Department will publish some detailed data for 2013 that hopefully
will help us tackle that question.
Meantime, there is one area we can speak to, the condition
of personal finances, a topic for which we already have a quantity of recent
information. One of the main causes of
the Great Recession was that people borrowed lots and lots of money. Much of the public commentary about that
recession asserts that financial speculation and bankers brought on the
crisis. Clearly they were important, but
it's also true that people took on more and more debt. Bankers and traders did speculative things
with that debt, but it all did start with the consumers who borrowed the money.
A key, then, to the resumption of
stronger growth is likely related to the progress people are making in
correcting this over-reaching.
Mortgages & Homeowners'
Mortgage debt expanded sharply from the middle of 2001
through 2006, over 13% a year. The
payments on that debt, so-called "debt service", surged from 5.9% of
people's disposable income in 2004 to 7.2% at the end of 2007. People who refinanced mortgages borrowed more
than their existing liability during those years, decreasing the equity they
had in their homes. Overall, this home
equity withdrawal amounted to almost $500 billion a year from 2003 to 2006.
As people were stretching their personal financial
conditions, interest rates began to rise in 2004 and people with adjustable
rate mortgages or initially low "teaser" rates saw their mortgage
payments go up sharply. By late 2006,
unusual numbers of borrowers started having trouble keeping current on their
payments on those and regular mortgages as well. The greater delinquencies hurt the lenders
and the owners of bonds backed by the mortgages. The climb in home sales peaked in 2005, and
they began to decline. Home prices
started to fall in 2006; although those have finally begun to climb again, they
remain well below their 2005/06 highs.
The result, even now, is that 17% of homeowners have a mortgage that is
larger than the value of their home. Called
"negative equity", that's actually an improvement from over 25% in
early 2013 and almost 31% in mid-2012, but remains a heavy weight on people's
approach to spending and their outlook on the economy in general.
Even now, after some recovery, housing and mortgage activity
remain in the doldrums. New home
construction this year is running no more than half the pace of 2005, and sales
of existing homes are still down some 30% from that year's pace. The latest weekly report from the Mortgage
Bankers Association shows a new recovery low last week in the volume of
mortgage applications. People are still staying
back from mortgage debt.
Credit Card Debt
Got Big Too
Another consumer debt issue is credit cards. From the spring of 2006 through early 2008,
credit card balances accelerated; from very modest growth of about 2%
year-over-year in early 2006, they were expanding at a 10% rate by late 2007.
Average credit card balances reached what are, to us,
astounding levels: in 2007, households
in the middle 20% income bracket owed $6,300 and those in the next rung down,
$4,900. Balances were higher, of course,
in higher brackets, so the average over the entire income span was $8,200. If these were charged interest at a common
credit card rate of 1-1/2% a month, the interest add-on each month would have
been $120! Delinquency rates on credit
cards in those years hovered around 9% and rose rapidly during the recession;
they reached 13.74% by the spring of 2010.
Credit card usage did slow.
By last year, the middle income bracket's average had fallen to just
$4,900 and the overall average to $5,700, this latter a reduction of 35% from
its peak. People are paying larger
portions of their bills each month too; from 19% of their balance each month in
2006, people in recent months have been paying almost 25%. The lower balances have obviously accompanied
more sluggish spending growth. In the
2004-2007 period of big increases in credit card balances, spending was
expanding at rates of 6 and 7% a year.
It declined outright in 2009 and has had a modest, uneven pattern since
then. In 2013, people increased their
outlays on categories of items that might be charged to a card by just 3% and
this year's second quarter was up 3.6% from a year earlier, half the pace
during the "spree".
There are numerous reasons for the currently mediocre
performance of the U.S. economy, and one of them is surely this restraint on
credit use. Some of this might be banks
turning down applications, but as we note with the mortgage information, people
are not even applying in much volume in the first place. In view of the excess of the 2004-2007
period, this caution is quite appropriate.
Importantly, it is helping to
improve credit quality; credit card delinquencies in the second quarter were
back down to 2.25%, and those on mortgages are down from a peak of 8.9% in
early 2010 to 3.4% in the latest period.
The better delinquency situation is laying the groundwork
for renewed spending growth on a much sounder basis. Recent retail sales reports suggest this
might be happening. Also, we do note
that people are buying cars these days and obviously borrowing to do that. After a long hiatus, many people's cars and
SUVs have simply grown old and need replacing, so it is not surprising to see
this. It is the only category of
ordinary consumer borrowing with much vigor.
People May Still
Not Be Saving Enough. Are You?
At the same time, there are two issues still to grapple
with: student loans and saving. Student
loans are a whole topic on their own and we will return to talk about them and
the "worth" of incurring big, long-term debt to pay for college. Saving has improved since the Crash and
recession, but continues as a matter of concern.
The saving rate, that is, the amount of personal income not
spent, got as low as 2% during the debt-spree years, reached a band of 6-7% in
2011 and 2012 and recently was 5.3% in the second quarter. So it's clearly up off the lows, but not
"high". Also what isn't
"high" is the number of people who actually have a cautionary stash
of emergency cash under their mattress (or in a safe bank account somewhere) . A special Federal Reserve survey of people's
economic well-being taken during 2013 asked them about this: "Have you set aside emergency or rainy
day funds that would cover your expenses for 3 months?" Only 39% of participants said yes. Further, younger people have a lower positive
response: only 33% of households headed by 18-44 year-old people said yes. There is no history of this for comparison,
so we don't know how low that number would have been during the spending-spree
So we are not surprised that the economy remains relatively
sluggish; we believe some of this reflects the extension of a rebuilding effort
for people's own financial standing.
There are lots of other issues, but that is certainly one that had not
impacted previous business cycles so deeply or pervasively. We've illustrated some progress, though, and
look forward to further improvement.
Meantime, stick a little cash under your mattress every paycheck until
you think you can cover three months' worth of expenses!
A new book, published just in May, encouraged us to give
these ideas some extra emphasis. House
of Debt, by Atif Mian and Amir Sufi, explores mortgage borrowing by zip
code around the country, highlighting the role of the debt itself in generating
the severe recessionary conditions throughout the economy, not just in the
housing sector. The book's subtitle is
"How They (and You) Caused the Great Recession, and How We Can Prevent It
from Happening Again." Hmmm.
We also consulted Stephan Whitaker's "The Evolution of
Household Leverage during the Recovery", an Economic Commentary of the
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, dated September 2, 2014. Whitaker has calculated household debt/income
ratios for census tracts around the country.
Footnotes cover specific data sources. Most of our actual data references come from
these sources as presented in the databases of Haver Analytics.
 Federal Reserve Board, Financial Accounts of the U.S. Equity withdrawal amounts are taken from
calculations made by Haver using those Federal Reserve data.
 Payment rates on credit cards from the Standard &
Poor's Ratings Services' U.S. Credit Card Quality Index (CCQI).
 Data on consumer spending from the Department of
Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), in the "national income
accounts", that is, the same dataset as GDP and its other components. We calculated a "credit card spending
subtotal" by taking total consumer spending and subtracting off housing
services, education, health care, vehicle purchases and other broad spending
categories that aren't likely to be paid for by charging to a credit card.
 The saving rate is also taken from the BEA's national
Labels: Economy, Financial Markets, Personal Finance
A Remembrance of Robin Williams
We have an article in process on consumer finances and their
role in the broader economy. Even as we
are working on that, we recognize that these days are full of heavy-weight
events in the world. In the last few
weeks, we have written of praying for peace (July 18) and we have offered
internet links to aid for the child immigrants in Texas (July 11). Now, we also need to pause and remember a
prominent man who has passed, Robin Williams.
There is much we could say about Williams. We could choose the serious side of his
passing, including his illnesses and the manner of his death. But in this moment, we choose to be
light-hearted and remember the fun he brought us. For Episcopalians, perhaps the easiest and
most sentimental expression of this is a recitation of the gift he gave to us
in particular, "The Top 10 Reasons for Being Episcopalian", which he
presented during an HBO special in 2002.
These have been making the rounds this past week and you may have seen
them already. There's even a tee shirt,
which you can find here: https://www.episcopalbookstore.com/product.aspx?productid=3171
The Top 10 Reasons for Being
9. You can believe in dinosaurs.
8. Male and female God created
them; male and female we ordain them.
7. You don't have to check your
brains at the door.
5. Church year is color-coded.
3. All of the pageantry - none of
2. You don't have to know how to
swim to get baptized.
And the Number One reason to be
1. No matter what you believe,
there's bound to be at least one other Episcopalian who agrees with you.
May Williams help us to laugh at ourselves, which we need to
do often and especially right now!
Labels: Episcopal Church, People
"The Courage to Grow Old"
Last year in this country, there were 19.5 million people
over age 75. This group made up 6.2% of
the total population. By 2026, just 12
years from now, Census Bureau projections indicate there will be about 10
million more of these elderly residents and they will be more than 8% of the
population, growing another 10 million through the subsequent nine years to
So Barbara Crafton has written a book on growing old. We know we don't need to justify any
particular choice of topic for her writings, and her own reason for writing on
this seems to be that she herself feels she is beginning "to grow
old", as is evident in the Preface and Chapter 1 of the book. Still, and perhaps too obvious to deserve
mention, this is a topic of broad general interest, and her comments on several
issues and her impressions of this time in our lives are significant for many
people and their publication significantly timed, as illustrated by our data
Some of the topics are practical: among others, how do you convince
your father that he shouldn't drive a car anymore? How do you handle really elderly parents who
want to live at home or in your home?
How do you conduct yourself on a date?[!] Also, quite logically but with great feeling,
how do you imagine approaching death and dying yourself?
So we have taken a step right here in what Barbara wants us
to do. We're talking about this. We've already taken a courageous step. See what she says on page 8:
In order to help those who love me
deal with my death, I must come to terms with it myself. It will help to think about death in
advance. Trust me [she says], this gets
easier to do with practice – those things of which we refuse to think don't
disappear meekly in response to our refusal:
they go underground. There they
grow in apparent size and virulence, becoming larger and more unthinkable than
they really are. What will happen to me
in my death is that I will join the billions of human beings who have died;
everyone who has ever lived has managed to do this.
We have already had experiences in our lives like this:
major losses, traumatic events. We
realize that in order to function more fully as time passes, the best way to
handle those experiences is to face them head on. Our own death is no different, apparently.
One chapter talks about pain, and Barbara is quick to
distinguish between acute pain and chronic pain. Acute pain sends a signal: oops, your finger is too close to the candle
flame. Ouch! Then you take action to stop it. Chronic pain is different. You have to learn to live with chronic pain
and counteract its source or compensate for it.
For instance, maybe your knees won't let you genuflect in church? Then bow instead [that's what we ourselves
have to do!]. She says these strategies
take courage too; from page 35:
I think chronic pain teaches
courage. Real courage, I mean, not
bravado – it teaches the kind of courage that looks unwaveringly at the way
things really are, rather than the strutting, noisy kind that asserts power it
doesn't possess and control over events that human beings don't really
run. No, the courage chronic pain can
teach us is the slow kind, the patient kind – maybe "maturity" is a
better term for it than "courage."
One more notion, an impressionist metaphor: "The Two
Baskets". We are in a basket that
is nested in a bigger basket. Page 80:
Baskets are woven, of course:
strips of grass or straw or wood thread intricately over and under one another
again and again . . . . But there is space between the strips, however tightly
they might be woven. You could peer out
one of those spaces, if you wanted to. . . . Yup, there's something out there
all right. But you can't see it very
clearly through that tiny opening.
Besides, who cares? This basket
is beautiful. It contains everything you
One day, though, the smaller basket
begins to fall apart . . . .
So you get the idea of where that image is going. Barbara helps us understand that we have been
inside the bigger basket all along.
In addition to Barbara's two baskets, we realize that we've actually
seen a third basket. A friend who lately
became a grandmother showed us a picture of her grandson smiling at us – from
the womb. The wonders of ultrasound let
us see inside and there was little Luke, inside the basket inside the basket
inside the basket . . . .
Barbara Crafton's book The Courage to Grow Old
by Morehouse, an imprint of Church Publishing, Incorporated. It is available from Amazon and Barnes &
Noble, in both paperback and Kindle or Nook editions.
Praying for Peace: It's All We Can Do
The Rev. F. M. Buddy Stallings, Rector of St. Bart's on Park
Avenue in Manhattan, is an Associate of the Geranium Farm; his pieces run on
the Farm's website page "A Few Good Writers". This morning, what he emailed sounds exactly
like what we feel about the two simultaneous awful-nesses that are impacting
the world right now, the shooting down of the plane in eastern Ukraine and the fighting
We mourn the loss of some AIDS scientists who were traveling
on the plane, as well as a member of the Dutch Senate, a nun returning to a
teaching job in Sydney after a study sabbatical in Europe, and the numerous
others traveling to Asia.
We learned that Ukraine was, until yesterday, on a major flying route
from Europe to Asia; planes are apparently now being rerouted over Turkey. How will the conflict over that region be reconciled?
We also wish over and over that the terrorism and the
Arab/Israeli distresses could be eased.
We were in the World Trade Center on 9/11, so this is a very personal
Those thoughts prompt us to respond here on Ways of the World, and we take the liberty of copying Buddy's comments so our own readers may see them.
Nothing I had planned to
write today seems weighty enough in light of the events of yesterday: the
shooting down of the Malaysian airliner and Israel's ground operation into
Gaza. . . .
And yet, each of us is
required to have some sort of public reaction -- not a position piece for sure,
but some orientation or perhaps world-view through which we process such
events. Over the years I have in some ways hidden from many of the hard
conversations about conflict and turmoil in the world by claiming that my
positions are theological not political: peace over war, non-violence over
violence, negotiation over action. Though lofty and pious, they also are not,
as I have been told with some regularity, particularly practical or easily
reduced to logistics about how we actually are to live together on an ever-
shrinking globe. I almost envy the bellicose, who at every turn say in a
million ways "there is going to be hell to pay for this; let's go blow
somebody up," and the equally certain, who seem to know in every case the
absolute moral decision to make.
I pray for peace; and
though that seems pretty weak and small, it is all I have. Though God may
clearly expect more, I am not sure what it is and at this point can only wait
until I have further light.
Labels: Prayer, World
Links for Helping with the Immigration Crisis in South Texas
Not your usual Ways of the World
We are –
many of you are, too, probably –
very concerned about the throngs of Central American children coming across the
Texas border. Yesterday, July 10, the Presiding
Bishop of the Episcopal Church, Katharine Jefferts Schori, called our attention
to the work on this crisis issue by various bodies of the Church. Her specific emphasis was on advocacy and
policy. She also certainly feels compassion for the kids themselves, and she urges us to pray and give
As we read her
in a daily email from Episcopal News Service, we were
moved to check on the website of Episcopal Relief & Development for possible
news of actual relief efforts. As many
of you know, the Geranium Farm are long-time supporters of ER-D's work. Sure enough, they are helping get resources
to the relief center being run in McAllen, Texas, right on the border across
the Rio Grande from Reynosa, Mexico, and between Brownsville and Laredo. St. John's Episcopal Church is pitching in at
the center, which is located at Sacred Heart Catholic Church and being managed
by Catholic Charities. At least one of
the local Baptist churches is also participating and possibly other churches.
If you want to send supplies directly to the center, here is
information from Sacred Heart Church: http://sacredheartchurch-mcallen.org/immigrant-assistance/
. This includes the address of the
drop-off center and an itemized list of what they need; it's pretty basic daily-living
stuff for adults and little kids.
Here is a link to the Diocese of
, which has posted pictures of the work and in-kind donations
that are being provided.
Finally, today's New York Times
ran a strongly
by an unlikely group of immigration reform advocates: Sheldon
Adelson, CEO of the Las Vegas Sands Corporation, Warren Buffet, CEO of
Berkshire Hathaway, and Bill Gates, Chair of the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation and a founder of Microsoft.
These three, who begin with the disclaimer that they don't have common
political perspectives, strongly urge the Congress to get its act together on
immigration reform legislation. This
presently appears unlikely to happen before the November election as everyone
wants to run away from the hot-button issue before constituents vote. But those little kids down there in Texas and
the adults who sent them need some clarity.
So too, as Adelson, Buffett and Gates argue, do the graduate students
from abroad working hard at our universities, and others anxious to come here
legally or to regularize their current status as residents of our country. Contact your Representatives. While the Church's advocacy work helps,
constituent contact will count too.
Labels: American Society, Episcopal Church, Government Policies